Silverio v. Sweetman
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Maureen Mowry v. Allstate Insurance Company (R.I. 2022)
- Maureen Mowry v. Allstate Insurance Company (R.I. 2022)
- Cannata v. Labutti, 99-3916 (r.I.super. 2004) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 2004)
- Bradley v. Gilchrist, 98-3355 (2003) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 2003)
- Hamrick v. Yellow Cab Company of Providence (R.I. 1973)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
A jury in the Superior Court awarded the plaintiff $2,500 as compensation for the injuries he sustained when he was struck by an automobile operated by the defendant. Not satisfied with that award, the plaintiff asked for an “additur and/or a new trial.” His motion was granted and a new trial on the question of damages only was ordered unless the defendant consented to. an additur in the amount of $5,000. The defendant refused to consent and appealed.
In pressing his appeal defendant does not contend that the amount of the additur was excessive or unreasonable, and that, therefore, we should recompute it. Instead, he argues that no additur whatsoever should have been granted. He supports that argument with the claim that the trial justice misconceived certain material evidence when he passed on the motion for a new trial. However, our own examination of the transcript satisfies us that the trial
The defendant’s objection is overruled and the case is remitted to the Superior Court for a new trial on damages only unless the defendant shall, within the period to be fixed by that court, consent to the additur heretofore awarded by the trial justice.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.