NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY v. Harsch
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Narragansett Electric Co. v. Harsch (R.I. 1977)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY
v.
William W. HARSCH et al.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Edwards & Angell, Knight Edwards, Edward F. Hindle, Deming E. Sherman, Providence, for petitioner.
Julius C. Michaelson, Atty. Gen., R. Daniel Prentiss, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Roberts & Willey Incorporated, Dennis J. Roberts II, (for Consumers' Council) Providence, for respondents.
ORDER
The petitioner's motion that the Attorney General be disallowed from filing a brief in the within case is denied without prejudice to raising the issue in its brief and in oral argument. Counsel for the parties are ordered to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments, in addition to other questions presented, the question of whether the Attorney General represented the public or the Public Utilities Commission and whether or not the Public Utilities Commission is a proper party to this appeal. See Hassell v. Zoning Bd. of Review of E. Providence, 108 R.I. 349, 275 A.2d 646 (1971).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.