Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1976

Narragansett Electric Co. v. Harsch

Narragansett Electric Co. v. Harsch
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided February 26, 1976
116 R.I. 907

Narragansett Electric Co. v. Harsch

Opinion of the Court

The petitioner’s motion that the Attorney General be disallowed from filing a brief in the within case is denied without prejudice to raising the issue in its brief and in oral argument.

Counsel for the parties are ordered to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments, in addition to other questions presented, the question of whether the Attorney General represented the public or the Public Utilities Commission and whether or not the Public Utilities Commission is a proper party to this appeal. See Hassell v. Zoning Bd. of Review of E. Providence, 108 R. I. 349, 275 A.2d 646 (1971).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.