State v. Lanoue
State v. Lanoue
119 R.I. 918; 378 A.2d 1077; 1977 R.I. LEXIS 2087
State v. Lanoue
Opinion of the Court
Because he failed to follow the avenue of direct appeal, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from this court. However, before we can address the issue of the writ, certain questions of fact must be established. Because this court cannot take testimony in a proceeding of this nature, the case is remanded to the Superior Court for an evidentiary hearing. See Lonardo v. Langlois, 98 R.I. 493, 205 A.2d 19 (1964).
After a hearing and fact findings, the Superior Court shall return the record to this court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.