ORDER

This case came before us on December 3, 1980 on the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal. Upon consideration of the arguments presented that the method of review sought by defendant board is inappropriate and in view of our decision in A. T. & G., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review, 113 R.I. 458, 322 A.2d 294 (1974), we conclude that said motion has merit.

Therefore, the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby granted.