This case came before us on March 6, 1980 on defendants’ motion under Rule 16(g) to affirm the judgment below vacating a lis pen-dens which plaintiff had placed upon land owned by certain *923of the defendants.

After hearing arguments of counsel and considering plaintiffs brief, we are of the opinion that the Superior Court justice correctly determined that the nature of plaintiff s action here did not justify the filing of a lis pendens. Therefore, the motion to affirm the judgment below is hereby granted.