Shilcock v. Banister
Opinion of the Court
And the Respondent comes into Court, and for Plea saith the Matters and Things herein contain4 are not within the Jurisdiction of this HonbIe Court, for that a special Contract was made at Land within the Town of Newport in the County of Newport the Twenty Sixth day of March A. D. 1743; between the Proponent and the respondent who is only part owner of sa ship and sa contract was then and there reduced to writing, by Virtue whereof the Proponent entered on Board the Ship within Mentioned, and
J. Honyman Att. pro Resp*
Which Plea being overruled the said Respondent farther pleads and says the Libel afores4 ought to be quashed
i* for that James Vaughan of the City of London in the Kingdom of Great Britain Merch1 are joint Owners of the Ship within named and therefore the Libel afores4 ought to have been brought agst the s4 James as well as the Respondent and of this etc.
2d For that the Proponent doth not say at what Place the Contract afores4 was made nor the place from which s4 Ship proceeded to South Carolina both of which are things absolutely necessary and of this etc.
3d For that the Proponent says in his Libel the Ship was sold in London and nevertheless pretends he was discharged from s4 Ship in Newport on the 18th Day of October 1743 and of this etc.
And the pleas afores4 being also over ruled the Respondent for Plea says that true it is the Dep1 did proceed a Voyage in the s4 Ship to South Carolina from thence to London afors4 Where he was discharged on or about the twenty second Day of July A D 1743 Where he reced Seven pounds Sterling Which with the Wages advanced before sailing and the Moneys the Proponant hath otherwise reced is the full of the proponents Wages Says he Oweth the Proponant nothing in manner and form as in the Libel is set forth and thereupon he prays to be dismist with Costs
J Honyman
Mr Samuel Banister being duly Sworn in Open Court by the Name of the Ever Living God Says that Thomas Shilcock, was Shipd Some time before he was Enterd in the Portage Bills but how long he could not Tell, but he knew s4 Shilcock was Absent and thereupon Advisd Mr John Banister to Ship another Mate in his Room
John Riders being duly Sworn in Open Court by the Name of the Ever Living God Says; That on or about the. fifteenth Day of March last he undertook to fix the Rigging and Sails of the Ship Three Sisters Thomas Mackfarland Master and was at the Sail loft and aboard the s4 Ship from that Time till about Ten or Eleven Days, That Once or Twice in that Time he hath Seen Thos Shillcock on board s4 Vessel but does not know of his doing any work till about the 26th or 27th of March He the said Shillcock having business of his own to do as the Deponent understood
I shall first Mention Some Pleas made by the Respondent the first to the Jurisdiction of the Court on Account of a Contract the Appellant Rec4
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.