Austin v. Dennis
Opinion of the Court
And the Respond1* Comes into Court and defends and says that true it is in the Cruise afores4 they took the Prize and the Moneys afores4 were divided according to the Articles afores4, And that afterwards the Proponents • (with others) having raised a Mutiny on Board was at his Own Request set a shore on Nomans Key and his share taken from him, it being forfeited according to the Articles, And as to the Pretended Corporal Punishment, they say none was inflicted on the Proponent. And thereupon they pray the Advisement of this Honble Court and to be dismist with Costs.
Thos Ward Adv1 pro Resp*
[Admiralty Papers, II, 53]
A Motion was made by the Respondts for the Appelets to Enact; but the Judge was contented With the Sa Plaintiffs Security.
The Court was Adjourned till Monday the 29th Ins* 3 a Clock P. M. The Court was Open’d Accord® to Adjournm* The Libel and citations read and the Plea Patrick Rogers being Sworn in C* on Oath declared that
Jo11 Austin The Morning he desired to go On Shore and the Officers consented and as he was going Mr Calder desired to see what he had with him When they found he had some Money woh was taken from him and then he refused to go, but was Obliged to go he further says he was whipt by the Gomps Quarter Master for some theft comita some time before A Whole Share 58
John Frazier on Oath declared in Court What Knowledge of you of the Affn betwn John Austin John Calder and John Dennis.
That John Austin was desirous to go on Shore wch was consented to but upon taking his Money Namely 39 Dollars from him, he was not willing to go
Wm Edmunds On Oath in Court declared, Wh* Knowledge have
The Boat8 mate told me he the sa Austin was desirous to go On Shore which I told him I could Obtain his leave wcb was granted, but his Money being taken he refused to go,
David Robinson On Oath What Knowledge have you of any difference or disturbance that was made on board the S P f. [Ship Prince Frederick] the night before sd Austin was set on Shore. There was One Martin Scot he Affronted the Master The Master went into the Cabin for his cane and Struck four or five of the men and fetch’d blood of one Tho8 Roe when the Compy compa to thr Quarter Master and the 'Captain came out when the Company when he discovrd the Sd Qr Mr giving an Acco* of it to the Cap* as usual Layd his hand on the Cap*8 Breast for woh the Cap* was very Angry, there was two men followed the Qur Mr Aft. Martin Scot and Harry Clark One of woh Struck Cap* Dennis Cap* Dennis inform’d him.
Qn Was John Austin the Appell* any ways concern’d in yr Differences
Anr No
Qn Do you know of his Money being taken from him by Mr J. Calder and what sum
Anr Yes thirty nine dollars by Mr Calder whereof he gave him back 3 Dollars
Qn Did he refuse to go On Shore after his Money was taken Away
Anr Yes Afterwards Mr Calder sd he should go on A Shore and Said he shd go into the Boat which he did and then he cryed because his money was kept from him
Ansr Normans Key A Place uninhabited
Qn Do you know w* he was whipt for
Anr A man that belong4 to the S. left her at Nevis and his Chest was brought upon deck and broke Open by Order of the Officers in wch was Several frocks one of them claim’d by s4 Austin and he laid it down upon the Round House, some of the Company Shifted it and Put Another in the Room of it, woh he Afterw4s claimed, thinking it to be the same, then the People said you dont know Which is yr own, and you shall have none and for that was whipt, by A Vote of the whole Company.
Qt Did you See the Quar1' Masr lay his hand on the Capts Breast
Anr No but the Cap11 Informed him of it
Q* How many men went aft wh the Qr Mr besides the two mention’d
Anr Several but I do not know their Names
Qt How far is No mans Key from Tolola
Anr About 5 leagues
Qt How was this Proponent dismist
Anr There was Provisions sent to him and the others that went on Shore the night before
Cap* Wm Allen Comr of the Brig* Prince William late in Cons*3 wh Cap* John Dennis
Qt Is* Do you know whether A Mutiny happen’d at Normans Key on b4 C: Dennis declare what you know of it
Anr In the Even® I was on Board Cap* Dennis and he and I with some of his Officers being on the Round House, I heard A Disturbance forward and Cap* Denis said it was A Mutiny and I saw the Compy come aft and Qr Master Strike Cap* Dennis with one hand whilst he held him w*11 the Other, I also heard Cap* Denis say Since they had desired to go on Shore they should, there was about forty of His hands that came aft w*h the Qr Mr at the time of Cap* Dennis being struck which was on or About the ninth of November and upon going into the Cabin and bringing out Cutlases the Mutiny ceased. And that David Robinson would have gone Ashore w‘h those Mutineers but the Officers ordered him into the Vessel and at the same time he cryed because they w4 not let him go.
Q* Do you know if he the s4 Robinson was one of the Mutineer
Anr I Cant say he was,
Mr Bull Objects against the Officers being evidence, as parties Interested ■ — ■ Over ruled Mr Peter Marshall, Mr John Gibbs, Mr Rich4 Clark And Wm Gibbs, On Oath declared to the truth of an Instrument Drawn up by them and Produced now in Court and Signed by them all Mr Marshall being Examin’d further
Qt Do you know anything of this John Austins being concern’d in the Mutiny declare what you know
Qf Who was it that differ’d forward before Mr Gibbs went there
Anr I do not know
Qf Did you hear any Noise before he went forwa
A nr Yes, nor did I hear any blows, but understood there had been some difference, whilst the Cap* and Officers were on shore.
Qf Did you see John Austin anyways Active, in the mutiny
Ansr No, but ca not distinguish one Person from Another it being dark
Qf How many of the Mutineers were cut of besides this man
Anr I do not know of any one
The Court was adjourned to friday next the 4th May*h 1744. 9 AClock A M
The Court being Open’d According to Adjournm*
The Appell* John Austin comes into Court and withdraws his Suit Against the Respond*8 John Dennis and John Calder this 4th day of May A.D. 1744
Henry Bull Adv: Pro Appel
[Admiralty Papers, II, 54]
David Robinson On Oath in Court
David Robinson Boatswain Mate of the Prince Frederick a private man of war Cap* John Dennis Comr on Oath Declares that being at a place called no mans Key in the West Indies on board Sa Sloop this deponent was ordered to get a chest up in woh was the things belonging to Some men who had deserted Sa Sloop and a dispute arrising concerning a frock wcl1 John Austin claimed and the Officers Said was not his Sa frock was put in the place where Sa Austins frock lay by Some persons unknown, and this deponent Says he
David Robinson his mark X
[Admiralty Papers, II, 56]
Thos Roe being Sworn in Court
Thomas Roe A marriner on board the Sloop Prince Frederick a private man of War John Dennis Commander on Oath declares that being on board Sa Sloop near an Island called nomans key in the west Indies on or about the u411 of Novr last the night after a disturbance on board had happened. John Austin a hand on board desiring to go on Shore and the gunner came
Newport May 7th 1744 Sworn before
[Admiralty Papers, II, 59]
Thomas Worgan a hand on board the Sloop Prince Frederick a private man of War John Dennis Com1' on his Oath Declares that being on board Sa Sloop at a place called Nomans Key in the West Indies on or about the 10th day of November last it being the night there had happened a disturbance on board. Willm Sweett came to him and Said that Cap4 Dennis ordered him to get of the depon4 the money that was put into his custody by Henry Clark and the dep4 delivered the money to Sa Sweett and as he was informed Sa Sweett gave it to the Cap4 and Said Clark informed him that the Cap4 returned him Six ps. 8/8 and then ordered him on Shore as one of the hands who were concerned in the disturbance on board Mem0 Cap4 Jn° Dennis and Jn° Caulder the Cap43 Qr Master being present objected to the above evidence the above depon4 (as they alleged) being one of the persons concerned in the disturbance above mentioned.
Newport May 7th 1744. Sworn before
Mr Worgan further said that Mr Henry Clark had 49 Dollars taken from him
[Admiralty Papers, II, 58]
Mathew Boston a marriner on board the Sloop Prince Fredrick a private man of war cap4 John Dennis Commr on Oath declares that on the 11th day of November last near a place in the west Indies called Nomans Key being on board sa Sloop Jn° Caulder Cap43 Qr master demanded of Jn° Austin to See what money he had in his possession alledging he might have more than he ought to have upon woh Sa Austin brought about 30 ps of 8/8 but does not know the Quantity exactly wch money sa caulder carried in to the round house. In the morning of sa day the depon4 Says that the Gunner informed him that Sa Austin had upon Some disturbance on board desire’d of the Cap4 to go on Shore and that leave was granted, and that Some time after
[Admiralty Papers, II, 57]
And the Defend* John Dennis comes into Court for Plea saith, that he ought to be acquitted from the within Libel for that John Calder one of the Persons against whom the Appell* hath declared and against whom the Citation was granted was not Cited to appear, and therefore by the rules of Law no further Proceedings can be had, and of this pray Judgement
J. Honeyman
[Admiralty Papers, II, 63]
And the Respondent John Dennis comes and defends and says that true it is in the Cruise afores4 th.ey took the Prize and the Moneys afores4 were divided according to the afores4 Articles And afterwards the Proponent with others having endeavored to raise a Mutiny on Board wherein the Proponent actually struck the Respondent whereupon he was set on Shoar at Noman’s Key and his Share taken from him it being forfeite according to the s4 Articles And thereupon the Respondent prays the Advisement of this honble Court and to be dismist with Costs.
J. Honyman Advocates
Tho Ward for the Respondt
[Admiralty Papers, II, 65]
Colony of Rhode Island etc. At a Court of Vice Admiralty held at Newport on thursday the 24th May at ten á Clock A M
The Court being Open’d and One of the Parties Namely Mr John Calder not being cited nor Present at s4 Court The advocates for the Respond*8 moved for an Adjournment which, was agreed to and Ordered so to be by the Judge till Saturday the 26* Ins*11 10 á Clock A. M.
The Court was Open’d Accordingly Libel and Citn Read —and Mr Honeyman Adv° for the Respond* made a plea that the Libel should be dis-mist by reason Mr John' Calder was not cited to Appear which was Overruled and the Judge Ordered the trial to come on, and the Court was Adjourn’d till monday morning 8 a Clock A: M
The Court was Adjourn’d till 3 a Clock in the Afternoon
The Court was Open’d Accordingly.
Mr Honeyman Adv° for the Respond*13 Asked Mr Thos Roe if he heard Cap* Dennis desire all or any of the persons that were inclined to go on shore with the Quar Master to which he Answer’d he heard no such thing
To wo!l sa Question Mr Mathew Boston answer’d He Did hear Cap* Dennis say so.
The Next morning Mr John Austin desired the Boatswains mate and the Gunner to Ask leave for him to go on Shore
Q* Was you in any Port After sa Austin was whipt. before you arrived at Normans Kee when Mr Austin ask’d to go on shore
Ansr No •— not to my knowledge
Qn How long was it before he Ask’d to go on shore that sa Austin was whip*
A.nsr I Reckon about a fortnight
Q’1 Was you at S* Christophers or Nevis during yr Cruise before you came to Normans Key
. Ansr Yes and came to an Anchor there
Qn How long did you lye at S* Christophers
Anr We did not lye one Day at S* Chrisrs but waterd at Nevis
Qn Was Austin whipt before you came to S* Christrs or Nevis
Anr I think He was to the best of my knowledge
Qn Was sa Austin on shore at S* Chrisrs or Nevis or did he ever desire to go on shore there
Anr Not to my knowledge
Qm How come you to say that you were at No port after Austin was whip’d and afterwards upon Other Questns Acknowledged you were at S* Chrisrs and Nevis before you came to Normans Key.
Ansr because my memory failed me
Quest to Mr Morgan
Who was the first Mover or Cause of the disturbance on board the Sloop Prince frederick whereof Cap* John Dennis was Commr
Ansr I did not see the first of it but I heard it was Mr Gibbs by the People on board, who struck Mr Scot and another man and the People Applied to the Companies Qr Master, who thereupon went aft and ask’d Mr Gibbs the Reason who Asked him what business it was of his, Upon which the Qn Master replyed if he was used so he desired to go on shore.
Qn Did any of the People Join to go on shore wth the Qr Masr
Anr Henry Clark said if the Qn Masr went on Shore he would go with him
Qn gy what means did they go on shore In A Boat or Swim on shore
Qn Was the People Uneasy at Mr Gibbs’s treatment for Striking Mr Scot and Tho3 Roe
Anr Yes further Questions put to Mr Boston
Qn Who was the first Mover or Cause of the disturbance on board the Sloop before mention’d
Anr Mr Gibbs who struck two or three of the hands and fetch’d blood of them and the Reason of it was the sa Gibbs being in Liquor
Mr. Morgan
Qn Was you ever put in Irons whilst you were on the Cruise in sa Sloop
Anr Yes
Qn What was the Occasion of it
Anr Some of the People went to the Cap* and told him that David Robinson and I were agreeing to go on Shore upon which I was Put in Irons
' Qn Do you know when said Austin was whipt
Anr I think at S* Chris13
Qn Do you know or did you hear that Cap* Dennis was Struck or no and by whom
Anr I heard he was Struck by Henry Clark
The Adv° Plead to the Merits
[Admiralty Papers, II, 64]
May 29th 1744
Colony of Rhode Island Curia Admiralitatis I have carefully examined the depositions relating to the Affair between Henry Clark and Cap* John Dennis and John Calder and given due Attention to the pleas of the Advocates on both sides, it does Plainly Appear to me that the sa Henry Clark was aiding and Assisting in the Mutiny which happen’d on board the Sloop Prince frederick in their Cruise for which reason his share was justly forfeited for the Use of the Afores4 Sloop and Company as by their Articles of Agreement sets forth. I therefore dismiss the said Libel the said Henry Clark Paying Costs of s4 Court. Leonard Lockman
May 29th 1744
Colony of Rhode Island Curia Admiralitatis I have carefully examined the depositions relating to the Affair between Austin and Capt. John Dennis and John Calder it does no ways Appear to me that s4 Austin was concern’d in any mutiny as Alledged Against him but that he was intirely innocent, and that the thirty Nine dollars in his Possession were unjustly taken from him and ought to be restored to him, I therefore Order and decree that the said thirty Nine dollars be immediately Paid to the Register of
Leonard Lockman
[Admiralty Papers, II, 66]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.