Devisees of Hawkins v. Arthur
Devisees of Hawkins v. Arthur
Opinion of the Court
in charging the jury told them, it was necessary for them to determine whether there ever was this reservation for the town of Saxagotha by the crown of Great Britain., or not i If so, then the inhabitants of Saxagotha township, for whose use and benefit it was reserved, were most unquestionably entitled to it; and that there was this reservation most evidently appeared by the plat produced, which had every appearance of authenticity attached to it. In the first place, there must have been an order of council made to have this town surveyed and laid out, otherwise the surveyor-general would never have proceeded to make it. In the next place, it appears from the face of the plat as well as from the testimony of the two surveyors, that this town must have been actually run out by metes and bounds by the surveyor-general, as directed by the governor and council. Again, the uses and purposes for which it was surveyed and laid off, is most evidept from the lots
It was as solemn an act on the part of the government, as any grant could be under the great seal of the province ; and any grant for the same lands afterwards must have been obtained by fraud or misrepresentation, and therefore null and void to all intents and purposes, as much as any junior grant obtained for land which had been formerly granted.
It appeared to him, that the king of Great Britain became atrujtee for the use of the said inhabitants, as soon as the reservation was completed, until the whole of the lots were granted away among the said inhabitants and their descendants, and so remained till the revolution was accomplished ; when the state of South Carolina succeeded to the trust, and now holds in trust all the ungranted lots and common, for the use of the inhabitants of the said town and township ; and that no other appropriation can be made of said land, but. for the use of the said inhabitants, agreeable to
The jury retired, and after remaining in their room a short time, returned a verdict for the defendants.
A notice of a motion for a new trial was then given by the plaintiffs’ counsel, bat it never was afterwards brought forward. They acquiesced in the verdict, and abandoned their claim.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The Devisees of Philip Hawkins, against Ambrose Arthur and others
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published