Strange v. Durham
Strange v. Durham
Opinion of the Court
All the other Judges concurred in opinion, however, that there should not be a new trial, as it could not vary the plaintiff’s right of action whether the defendant knew that his title was good or bad. It did not depend on the defendant’s knowledge or ignorance of the plaintiff’s title, but on the statute, which had expressly taken away the plaintiff’s remedy, unless his action had been commenced within five years from the time of defendant’s entry upon the lanff.
Rule for new trial discharged.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.