Iii this Case it wás decided, that where one of several jjáf triers is resident here or'within the jurisdiction of the Court', the absent copartner cannot be made a party defendant in'a process against the firm, by attachment either directed against his private".property, or the property of the firm, arid that the' only mode of making him a- party , is by seiViti'g the usual process on the resident partner-, in the manner prescribed by the act of 1792. 2 Brev. 17Í.