Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1827

Farmer v. Frey

Farmer v. Frey
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 15, 1827 · Nott
15 S.C.L. 160

Farmer v. Frey

Opinion of the Court

Curia, per

Nott, J.

This is a new question, and has been submitted without argument or authority, and I haa| not been able to find any case having a direct applicatiiH fo it. My first impression was that the ordqr ought to have been granted. But a little reflection has led me to a different conclusion. They have no authority in the' courts to order rules of reference in cases pending before them. It is a practice introduced by the parties, to which the court lends its sanction, but it can only be done by consent; it is therefore only an act of the parties, and not of the court, and cannot be considered as any part of the record, until the award is returned and confirmed by the court. If either party dies in the mean time, the suit abates, and the award is gone. There is no record on which it can be founded, and although it may be good, as an award it cannot be made a judgment of the court. I am of opinion therefore, that the decision was correct, and the motion ought to be refused.

Motion refused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.