Trescott v. M'Laughlin
Trescott v. M'Laughlin
Opinion of the Court
Curia, per
It is the duty of the court to give such a construction to the acts of the legislature as will carry into effect their obvious intention. The construction which has been given to this act by the presiding judge accords with its letter, but it is in direct opposition to its spirit, and must entirely defeat its operation; for it is notin one case in an hundred that the order for sale can be obtained at the same court at which the judgment is obtained; and it may very often happen that the intermediate judgment, which gives jurisdiction to the court, is obtained at the same court with the l^jBfltent on the debt secured by the mortgage. Now whe®the
The law is certainly very inartificially drawn, and I will not say that the rule is the best which could be made to carry the law into effect, but they may receive such a construction as will meet every case contemplated by the act and afford that remedy which is indispensably necessary in most cases.
In the first place the law gives the power to the court lo order the sale of the mortgaged property for the satisfaction of the monies secured by the mortgagee. Now this is a complete and substantial grant of power. What follows is matter of discretion, and to give a reasonable extension of the time when the sale is to take
The object of the law. was to save expense and to furnish a more expeditious mode of foreclosing mortgages than that practised in the court of equity; for in cases where the amount was not great such is the expense attending that court and the delays incident to that mode of administering justice, that it would be better for the party holding a mortgage to abandon it altogether rather than attempt to foreclose it in equity. Now it will at once be perceived that where the rule is not served on the defendant before the court sits, and before the judgment is obtained, the order for sale can never be obtained at the same court at which the judgment is entered up. Again to give the act the construction which it has received on the circuit, would be to compel every creditor immediately to proceed to sell his debtors property; and it cannot be imagined that such was the intention of the legislature. The creditor when he wishes to foreclose his mortgage may file his suggestion at any time after the suit is commenced, and he may serve the debtor with the notice to appear at the court which he expects to get a judgment, and if he should obtain the judgment and there be no opposition the order may be made, but if he does not wish to distress or press his debtor, or if on the return of the rule, any objection should be made which could not be immediately determined, then the act could not operate. If the construction which it has received be sanctioned, thus and in many other ways would it be rendered inoperative. But we feel bound to carry the act into effect and see no such ambiguity in its language or provisions as to prevent us from doing so.
fíale ordered
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.