Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1836

Hogg v. Martin

Hogg v. Martin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided May 10, 1836 · Besaüss, Butlejr, Earle, Harper, Henry, John, Johnston, Neall, Richardson
22 S.C.L. 156

Hogg v. Martin

Opinion of the Court

We concur in the law of the case as ruled by the Judge below. Upon the facts we perceive no reason to be dissatisfied with the verdict of the Jury. The motion is dismissed.

JOHN B. O’NEALL, HENRY V/. BESAÜSS'ÜE'E, 3. JOHNSTON, 3. S. RICHARDSON, Wf. HARPER, A. P. BUTLEJR, B. 3- EARLE.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑