Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1839

State v. Stone

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided February 15, 1839 · Butler, Curia, Earle, Evans, Gantt, Indisposition, Oneall, Richardson

24 S.C.L. 147

Opinion of the Court

Curia, per ONeall, J.

In this case, we perceive no error in the legal instructions given to the jury. The facts well warranted the verdict.

The motion is dismissed.

Gantt, Evans and Butler, Justices, concurred. Richardson, *150J. was absent 'from indisposition. Earle, J. was absent at the argument, but concurred in the judgment. M’Carthy, for the motion. Solicitor Edwards, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.