Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1839

State v. O'Conner

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided February 15, 1839 · Butler, Cuhia, Earle, Evans, Hearing, Indisposition, Neall, Richardson

24 S.C.L. 150

Opinion of the Court

Cuhia, per O’Neall, J.

This court concurs in the point of law ruled by the judge below. His judgment has the sanction of the case of Woodward v. Hill, 3 M'Cord. Rep. 241.

The motion is dismissed.

E. & A, Rhett, for the motion. Solicitor Edwards, contra. Evans and Butler, Justices, concurred. Richardson, J. absent from indisposition. Earle, J. absent at the hearing, but concurred in the judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.