Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1839

Capers v. Fripp

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided February 15, 1839 · Cuma, Earle, Evans, Gantt, Neall, Richardson

24 S.C.L. 224

Opinion of the Court

Cuma, per Richardson, J.

The court considers the charge of the presiding judge correct and sufficient, according to the essential facts of the case, and the verdict satisfactory; but avoids giving any opinion upon questions not essential to the particular case and the verdict for the plaintiff.

The motion is dismissed.

Gantt, Evans, O’Neall, and Earle, Justices, concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.