Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1843

Hinds v. Evans

Hinds v. Evans
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 15, 1843 · Bütler, Evans, Npall, Richardson, Wardlaw
29 S.C.L. 17

Hinds v. Evans

Opinion of the Court

Curia, iper

Wardlaw, J.

Under the case of Purvis vs. Robinson, 1st Bay, 493, and other cases following it, proof of the loss of a deed, to admit an office copy, need not be plenary; that proper search has been made in the place to which the has been stowed, without finding it, will gen-* erally be sufficient; but a hasty search, with a belief that the deed could be found if well looked for, cannot justify the introduction of a copy: unless we mean to leave it discretionary with the párties or their agents whether to produce the original or a copy.

The motion is dismissed.

Richardson, O’Npall., Evans and Bütler, J J, concurred,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.