Parris v. Jenkins
Parris v. Jenkins
Opinion of the Court
Evidence of the message delivered' by the negro driver was received, not to shew that such message was sent, but to explain the defendant’s, act in sending the woman, and rebut the presumption unfavorable to his rights that might have arisen from that act unexplained. Parris may have not put those words into the negro’s mouth, but the negro used them; and were they not calculated to produce an effect upon Jenkins? It is just as if Jenkins, adopting the words of the negro, had said, when he sent the woman — “ I send her to help a little while, because my father-in-law is backwardand so these words are part of the res gestee — an explanation, by cotemporaneous acts or declarations of the motives or objects of the principal act, which would otherwise be of ambiguous or contrary import. The words of a negro are at least as significant as the cry of a brute animal, or any sound proceeding from inanimate substances ; and if any sound whatever, cotemporaneous with an act, or nearly connected with it, might serve to give meaning to the act, it would be admissible, not only to shew that there was such sound, but, if important, as nearly as possible to de
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.