Clarke v. West
Clarke v. West
Opinion of the Court
On the reading of the brief ait objection was suggested by the Court, which was not made in the case, that under the Act of 1839, 11 Stat. 42, the subject of the appeal is referred to the court of Equity; and that this Court has no jurisdiction. By that Act it is provided, “if any person or persons shall think themselves aggrievedby any judgment, sentence, decree, determination, denial or order of any of the Courts of ordinary, it shall and may be lawful for such person to appeal therefrom, to the Court of Common Pleas, or Equity.” If the appeal should be from any “judgment, &c. relative to any last will or testament,” the appeal shall be to the Court of Common Pleas. If the appeal should be “ on a matter of ac^ count, the appellant shall docket the case in the Court of Equity for hearing at its next term.” “If the Court should modify the said decree, it may order the Commissioner to re-state the accounts,” (fee. The subject of appeal from the Court of Ordinary, in this case, was an item of the account between H. R. West, the appellant’s intestate, and the estate of James Bowers, of which he was administrator, in which the appellant’s intestate was charged with a large
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.