Cheves v. Adams
Cheves v. Adams
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
An act for regulating fees, passed February, 1791, (4 Stat., 156) provides amongst other fees for sheriffs: “For every return of a writ, where the goods or persons are not to be found, two shillings,’’ (about forty-three cents.”) An act of the same session (7 Stat., 264, sec. 10,) requires sheriffs to make return on oath of executions lodged with them; and a subsequent Act of 1799 (7 Stat.., 296.) imposes a penalty in addition to liability for damages, upon a sheriff who neglects to return an execution. An Act of 1827 (6 Slat., 334,) regulating fees, amongst sheriff’s fees, has this item nearly copied from the Act of 1791: “returning a writ where goods or persons are not found, fifty cents.” Another Act of 1827, (6 Stat., 329,) which went into operation in February, 1828, intended to prevent the frequent removal of executions, requires a return to be made at every term during the active energy of an execution, which has not been withdrawn from the sheriff, or returned fully executed; the writ itself, if not before withdrawn or returned fully executed, to be returned at the Term when its active energy eea-sos; at all previous terms a separate return in writing to be made, but the writ itself to be retained by the sheriff. An Act of 1839, (4 Stat., 4,) providing a new fee bill, gives to the sheriff, “for search for person or goods not found, and return on the execution of non est inventus, or nulla bona, fifty cents;” and in another clause, to remove all doubts concerning the separate returns required by the Act of 1827, gives “on each case returned in schedule, according to the Act of 1827, fifty
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.