State v. Salley
State v. Salley
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Willie Salley, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-370
Submitted March 26, 2003 Filed May
22, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant Willie Salley was convicted of breach of trust, less than $5,000. The trial court sentenced him to five years suspended to five years probation with restitution. The court further ordered that Salleys probation could terminate after eighteen months if he had paid the restitution in full and was otherwise in compliance with the terms of his probation. Counsel for Salley attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Salley did not file a pro se response.
After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Salleys appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CURETON, ANDERSON and HUFF, JJ. concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.