State v. Fleming
State v. Fleming
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Douglas Eric Fleming, Appellant.
Appeal From Florence County
James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-201
Submitted January 29, 2003 Filed March 17, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr. and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Douglas Fleming appeals from his probation revocation, arguing his right to due process was violated because he was not provided a preliminary hearing. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Flemings appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.