State v. Reed
State v. Reed
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Reginald Reed, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-192
Submitted January 29, 2003 Filed March
13, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Reginald Reed appeals his guilty plea to fifteen counts of forgery, arguing the trial judge violated the mandate of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1965), by accepting a plea that was not knowingly and voluntarily entered. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Reeds appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.