State v. Pearson
State v. Pearson
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Corey Pearson Appellant.
Appeal From Lee County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-296
Submitted February 20, 2003 - Filed
April 30, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia; for Appellant
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Corey Pearson appeals from his guilty plea to two counts of second-degree burglary and two counts of grand larceny, arguing his sentence was based on invalid considerations. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Pearsons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.