Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2003

State v. Ware

State v. Ware
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided April 24, 2003

State v. Ware

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Willis W. Ware, Jr.,        Appellant.


Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-285
Submitted February 20, 2003 – Filed April 24, 2003  


APPEAL DISMISSED


Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal ServicesTeresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Willis W. Ware appeals the revocation of his probation.  Ware’s appellate counsel has petitioned to be relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed the record and has concluded Ware’s appeal is without merit.  Ware has not filed any materials on his own behalf.

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Ware’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.


[1]   Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.