Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2003

State v. Seals

State v. Seals
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided April 17, 2003

State v. Seals

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Pamela Byars Seals,        Appellant.


Appeal From Greenville County
Joseph J. Watson , Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-282
Submitted February 20, 2003 – Filed April 17, 2003   


VACATED


Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Pamela Seals appeals her convictions for breaking and entering a motor vehicle and financial transaction card theft, asserting that the indictments were not submitted to the grand jury and that she did not execute a written waiver of presentment.  We vacate [1] these convictions pursuant to Rule 220, SCACR, and the following authorities: Odom v. State350 S.C. 300, 302, 566 S.E.2d 528, 529 (2002) (requiring waivers of presentment to be in writing in order to be valid); State v. Evans, 307 S.C. 477, 479, 415 S.E.2d 816, 817 (1992) (finding that in the absence of an indictment by the grand jury or a valid waiver of presentment of an indictment, the circuit court lacks jurisdiction over an offense). 

VACATED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.


[1]   We affirm this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.