State v. Clark-Scherer
State v. Clark-Scherer
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Amber Clark-Scherer, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-313
Submitted February 20, 2003 Filed May 6, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Amber Clark-Scherer appeals from her guilty plea to three counts of breach of trust with fraudulent intent. Clark-Scherer asserts the trial court erred in accepting her guilty plea without inquiring into whether she understood that the pleas would waive her right to confront her accusers and the privilege against self-incrimination. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Clark-Scherers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.