State v. Portwood
State v. Portwood
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Alonzo Portwood, Appellant.
Appeal From Sumter County
Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2003-UP-508
Submitted June 9, 2003 Filed August 27, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, Cecil Kelley Jackson, Third Circuit Solicitor's Office, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Alonso Portwood appeals his convictions for voluntary manslaughter and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, arguing that the trial judge failed to grant a directed verdict because his co-defendant, not he, shot the victim. Portwoods counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Portwood filed a separate pro se brief, arguing the trial judge erred in failing to grant his motion for a new trial. After a thorough review of the record, Portwoods pro se brief, and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Portwoods appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.