State v. Faile
State v. Faile
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Gregory Allen Faile, Appellant,
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-615
Submitted August 20, 2003 Filed October
21, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Gregory Allen Faile appeals from the trial courts acceptance of his guilty plea for driving under the influence (second), driving under suspension (second), and habitual traffic offender. Faile argues the pleas were not knowingly and intelligently made due to his disagreement with the States facts. Failes counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Failes appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.