State v. Good
State v. Good
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Christopher Lamonte Good, Appellant
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-601
Submitted August 20, 2003 Filed October
20,2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare , of Columbia, for Appellant
Deputy Director for Legal Services, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr. and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Christopher Lamonte Good appeals the revocation of his probationary sentence. On December 13, 2000, Good pled guilty to assault with intent to kill. The trial judge sentenced Good to five years imprisonment, suspended upon the service of three years probation. On August 30, 2002, the judge revoked Goods probation due to violations
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Good attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating she had reviewed the record and concluded Goods appeal is without legal merit sufficient to warrant a new trial. Good did not file a separate pro se response.
After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.