State v. Batts
State v. Batts
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Sylvester Batts, Appellant,
Appeal From Richland County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-643
Submitted August 20, 2003 Filed November
4, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender, Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, S.C. Dept. of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Sylvester Batts appeals from his probation revocation, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by acting arbitrarily and capriciously in revoking Battss probation. Battss counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Battss appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., ANDERSON, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.