State v. Redd
State v. Redd
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Chad Redd, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-752
Submitted October 15, 2003 Filed December 18, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Chad Redd appeals from the revocation of his probation. Counsel for Redd attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Redd did not file a separate pro se brief.
After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Redds appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
STILWELL, BEATTY, and CURETON, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.