State v. Grandison
State v. Grandison
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jason Grandison Appellant.
Appeal From Marlboro County
Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-116
Submitted November 19, 2003 Filed
February 24, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellant Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Darlington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jason Grandison was indicted for and convicted of the armed robbery of Judys ABC Store in Marlboro County. He was tried with co-defendant Quincy Lowery. Grandisons appellate counsel submitted a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed the record and has concluded Grandisons appeal is without merit. Grandison did not file a pro se brief with the court.
After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Grandisons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.