State v. Brown
State v. Brown
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Christopher Brown, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-527
Submitted October 1, 2004 Filed October 18, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott , all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Christopher Brown appeals his guilty plea to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. Counsel for Brown attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Brown did not file a separate pro se response.
After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Browns appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
STILWELL, BEATTY, and SHORT, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.