State v. McClellan
State v. McClellan
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jay Lamar McClellan, Appellant.
Appeal From Georgetown County
John M. Milling, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-432
Submitted July 1, 2005 Filed July 13, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jay McClellan appeals his sentence of nineteen years imprisonment for aiding and abetting homicide by child abuse. He maintains the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant McClellan a continuance. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] McClellans appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J. and BEATTY and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.