State v. Mack
State v. Mack
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Amos Mack, Appellant.
Appeal From Orangeburg County
Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-437
Submitted July 1, 2005 Filed July 13, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert D. Robbins, of Summerville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Amos Mack was indicted for failure to stop for a blue light or siren. Mack was tried before a jury in his absence, and the jury found him guilty. The trial court sentenced Mack to five years imprisonment and revoked Macks three-year suspended sentence on a previous conviction. Macks counsel filed a petition to be relieved as counsel. Mack filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, STILWELL, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.