State v. Miller
State v. Miller
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
JoAnne S. Miller, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-491
Submitted August 1, 2005 Filed August 17, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Joanne S. Miller appeals her convictions for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature and criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Millers counsel attached a petition to be relieved as counsel to the final brief, stating she reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Miller did not file a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Millers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
ANDERSON, HUFF, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.