State v. Pilgrim
State v. Pilgrim
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Joshua Pilgrim, Appellant.
Appeal From Pickens County
C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-476
Submitted August 1, 2005 Filed August 8, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Joshua Pilgrim appeals his guilty plea to two counts of first-degree burglary, one count of grand larceny, and two counts of petit larceny. Pilgrim argues the trial judge erred in accepting his plea because the court failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Pilgrims appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J. concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.