State v. Demetrio Sears
State v. Demetrio Sears
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Demetrio Luis Sears, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-126
Submitted February 1, 2006 Filed February 24, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Demetrio Luis Sears appeals his conviction and sentence of eighteen years for attempted armed robbery. Sears argues the trial court should have instructed the jury that he had a right to arm himself if he reasonably believed that he was acting in self-defense. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Searss appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and ANDERSON and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.