State v. Ayers
State v. Ayers
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Todd Houston Ayers Appellant.
Appeal From York County
Roger L. Couch, Special Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-107
Submitted February 1, 2006 Filed February 21, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Sally W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: A jury convicted Todd Houston Ayers of assault and battery with intent to kill and was sentenced to twelve years in prison. On appeal, Ayers argues the indictment against him was insufficient and therefore the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to convict him. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Ayers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
BEATTY, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.