State v. Acton
State v. Acton
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Edward G. Acton, Appellant.
Appeal from Colleton County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-106
Submitted February 1, 2006 Filed February 21, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Edward G. Acton appeals the revocation of his probation and the reinstatement of his ten year sentence for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. Pursuant to State v. Archie, 322 S.C. 135, 470 S.E.2d 380 (Ct. App. 1996), Acton contends the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his probation. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Actons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
BEATTY, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.