SCDSS v. Edwards
SCDSS v. Edwards
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
SCDSS, Respondent,
v.
Kenneth L. Edwards, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Frances P. Segars-Andrews, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-113
Submitted February 1, 2006 Filed February 21, 2006
AFFIRMED
Kenneth L. Edwards, of Hollywood, pro se for Appellant.
John M. Magera, of Mt. Pleasant, and Pamela Denise Brown, of N. Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIUM: Kenneth Edwards appeals a family court order registering a North Carolina judgment against him for child support and other costs, claiming North Carolina did not have personal jurisdiction. Because Edwards was aware of the North Carolina actions and subject to North Carolinas jurisdiction, as evidenced by the signed certified mail receipt and the affidavit from the wifes attorney, we find the order valid and remaining in effect. We affirm the trial courts finding that Edwards should continue to pay $300 per month on the arrears due in his child support case pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:[1] S. C. Code Ann. § 20-7-1144 (Supp. 1996) (holding the non-registering party bears the burden of proving the issuing tribunal lacked personal jurisdiction over the party contesting registration) and N. C. Gen. Stat. 50A-4, repealed by S.L. 1999-223, § 1(b), eff. Oct. 1, 1999 (providing notice requirements to obtain jurisdiction over out-of-state residents).
AFFIRMED.
HEARN, C.J., and ANDERSON and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.