State v. Alexander
State v. Alexander
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Willie Lloyd Alexander, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-104
Submitted February 1, 2006 Filed February 17, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Steven M. Hisker, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Willie Lloyd Alexander appeals his conviction and sentence of fourteen years for attempted armed robbery. Alexander argues the trial court erred by permitting the State to cross examine him about prior arrests that did not result in conviction. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Alexanders appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and ANDERSON and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.