State v. McKenzie
State v. McKenzie
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Leroy A. McKenzie, Appellant.
Appeal From Sumter County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-172
Submitted March 1, 2006 Filed March 22, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Leroy A. McKenzie appeals his convictions and sentences of life, thirty years, and five years for murder, burglary in the first degree, and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, respectively. McKenzie argues the trial court improperly allowed hearsay testimony causing incurable prejudice. Also, McKenzie filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] McKenzies appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
BEATTY, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.