State v. Garrett
State v. Garrett
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Dennis Garrett, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-159
Submitted March 1, 2006 Filed March 15, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dennis Garrett, Jr. appeals from his guilty plea to second-degree burglary. He contends the circuit court erred by accepting his plea without obtaining a waiver of his right against self-incrimination and his right to confront his accusers. Garretts counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating he had reviewed the record and concluded Garretts appeal lacks merit. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Garretts appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., ANDERSON, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.