State v. Martin
State v. Martin
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Roger Dewayne Martin, Appellant,
Appeal From Aiken County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-149
Submitted March 1, 2006 Filed March 13, 2006
DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Roger Dewayne Martin was convicted of murder and possession of a firearm during commission of a violent crime. He maintains the trial judge erred in sending only the definitions of the three crimes charged in response to the jurys request for an additional charge. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Smiths appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., ANDERSON, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.