State v. Hollingsworth
State v. Hollingsworth
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Alvin Hollingsworth, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-142
Submitted March 1, 2006 Filed March 13, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, II, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, and Barbara R. Morgan, Second Circuit Solicitor's Office, of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Alvin Hollingsworth appeals his guilty plea and sentence for armed robbery. Hollingsworth contends that the judge should have allowed him to plea guilty but mentally ill, so that he could receive treatment while incarcerated pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 17-24-70 (2003). This appeal is dismissed under Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsels motion to be relieved is granted.
After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]
BEATTY, SHORT AND WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.