State v. Loving
State v. Loving
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Ronnie Edward Loving, Appellant.
Appeal From Cherokee County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-231
Submitted April 1, 2006 Filed April 25, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Ronnie E. Loving appeals his conviction and sentence for felony driving under the influence causing great bodily injury. Counsel for Loving attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Loving did not file a separate pro se response.
After a thorough review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Lovings appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.