Jones v. State
Jones v. State
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Nathaniel Jones, Appellant,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appeal From Florence County
James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-199
Submitted April 1, 2006 Filed April 14, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Lakesha W. Jeffries, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Jones appeals the trial courts dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Counsel for Jones attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Jones filed a separate pro se response.
After a thorough review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Jones appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.